Adjoint and inverse
Building the cofactor matrix, transposing it to get the adjoint, and dividing by the determinant to get the inverse — plus the Gauss–Jordan route and the properties of A⁻¹.
Module contents
Division is not defined for matrices. The inverse is what replaces it.
Definition
For a square matrix of order , the inverse is the matrix satisfying
Existence. exists if and only if — that is, if and only if is non-singular. When it exists it is unique.
Route 1 — The adjoint method
Three steps, in this order. Do not skip the transpose.
Step 1 — Cofactor matrix
Replace each element by its cofactor .
For a this means nine determinants and nine signs.
Step 2 — Adjoint
The adjoint (or adjugate) is the transpose of the cofactor matrix:
Note the index order: the adjoint's entry is the cofactor . Forgetting this transpose is the single most common error in the topic.
Step 3 — Divide by the determinant
The shortcut for 2 × 2
For :
Swap the diagonal, negate the off-diagonal, divide by . Memorise this; it appears constantly.
The identity behind the formula
This holds for every square matrix, singular or not. Dividing through by — legal only when — produces the inverse formula. Whenever a question asks you to "verify ", this is what it wants.
Route 2 — Gauss–Jordan (elementary row operations)
Often faster for and much faster beyond, and it needs no cofactors.
- Write the augmented array .
- Apply elementary row operations to the whole array until the left block becomes .
- The right block is now :
If a row of the left block ever becomes all zeros, is singular and has no inverse — stop there.
The three permitted elementary row operations are:
- — interchange two rows
- with — scale a row
- — add a multiple of another row
Properties of the inverse
| Property | Statement |
|---|---|
| Involution | |
| Reversal | |
| Transpose | |
| Determinant | |
| Scalar | , |
| Powers |
Note that reverses the order, exactly as the transpose does.
Properties of the adjoint
For a non-singular of order :
Which route to use
| Case | Route |
|---|---|
| The swap-and-negate shortcut | |
| , question says "using adjoint" | Adjoint method |
| , method free | Either; Gauss–Jordan has fewer sign traps |
| and above | Gauss–Jordan |
| Orthogonal matrix | , no work needed |
| Involutory matrix | , no work needed |
Worked examples
3 solvedEvery step is shown, in the order you would write it in an answer book.
Inverse of a 2 × 2 matrix
Question
Find for and verify.
Determinant
Non-singular, so the inverse exists.
Adjoint by swap-and-negate
Swap and ; negate and :
Divide
Verify
Answer
Inverse of a 3 × 3 by the adjoint method
Question
Find for .
Determinant — expand along row 2 (it has a zero)
Row 2 is with signs :
, so exists — and the division at the end will be free.
Cofactors, row 1
Cofactors, row 2
Cofactors, row 3
Cofactor matrix, then transpose it
Divide by
Verify one row
Row 1 of against column 1 of :
Row 1 of against column 2 of :
Answer
NoteLay the nine cofactors out in a grid as you compute them, then transpose once at the end. Trying to write the adjoint directly is where sign errors creep in.
The same inverse by Gauss–Jordan
Question
Find for using elementary row operations.
Set up the augmented array
Make a leading 1 —
Clear below —
Make the second leading 1 —
Clear above —
Read off the right block
Cross-check with the shortcut: , and swap-and-negate gives ✓
Answer
Practice problems
7 with solutionsWork each one on paper first. The full solution — not just the answer — is one click away.
Find the inverse of , or show it does not exist.
Show solutionHide solution
Non-singular, so the inverse exists.
Check: ✓
Show that has no inverse.
Show solutionHide solution
Since , the matrix is singular and does not exist.
The reason is visible in the matrix: row 1 is exactly row 2, so the rows are proportional and property P6 forces the determinant to zero.
Find and for .
Show solutionHide solution
Determinant (row 1):
Cofactors.
Cofactor matrix and adjoint.
Inverse.
Check (row 1 of × column 1 of ): ✓
Find for by Gauss–Jordan.
Show solutionHide solution
, :
:
:
:
, :
Check (row 1 of × column 1 of ): ✓
(row 2 of × column 1): ✓
If , verify .
Show solutionHide solution
Multiplying on the other side gives the same:
is a non-singular matrix of order with . Find , and .
Show solutionHide solution
Here .
. Take determinants of the identity :
. Apply the same rule to the matrix , whose determinant is :
(Equivalently .)
. From , taking determinants gives :
If and are non-singular matrices of the same order, prove .
Show solutionHide solution
To prove is the inverse of , it is enough to show and . Take .
First product, using associativity throughout:
Second product:
Both products give , and the inverse is unique, so
Why the order reverses. must be adjacent to for the cancellation to happen. Writing would leave , which does not simplify unless and happen to commute.