Ruled

Cayley–Hamilton theorem

Every matrix satisfies its own characteristic equation — and how to use that to find inverses and reduce high powers without heavy computation.

Statement

Every square matrix satisfies its own characteristic equation.

If the characteristic equation of is

then replacing by and the constant term by gives a true matrix identity:

Note carefully: the right-hand side is the null matrix , not the scalar , and the constant term carries an . Writing alone is dimensionally meaningless.

Order 2

Order 3

with , sum of principal minors, .

Use 1 — Finding the inverse

This is the most common exam application. Start from the theorem for order :

Multiply throughout by (legal when ), using :

Rearrange:

For order the same procedure gives

No cofactors, no adjoint — just one matrix multiplication and some scalar arithmetic.

Why this fails for singular matrices. The constant term is . Dividing by it is exactly the step that requires .

Use 2 — Reducing high powers

The theorem expresses in terms of lower powers:

Multiply by to get in terms of — then substitute the line above to bring it back down. Repeating this, every power of reduces to a combination of .

For large exponents there is a cleaner route: divide the polynomial by the characteristic polynomial ,

Since , substituting collapses the first term:

So computing needs only a polynomial remainder and then a matrix of degree at most .

Verifying the theorem

When a question says "verify the Cayley–Hamilton theorem for ", it wants:

  1. The characteristic equation of .
  2. The powers (and if order ), computed explicitly.
  3. Substitution into the equation, position by position, ending at .

Show the arithmetic. The mark scheme is for the working, not the conclusion.

Worked examples

2 solved

Every step is shown, in the order you would write it in an answer book.

Example 1

Verifying the theorem for a 2 × 2 and finding A⁻¹

Question

Verify the Cayley–Hamilton theorem for and use it to find .

  1. Characteristic equation

  2. Compute

  3. Substitute into

    The theorem is verified.

  4. Multiply the identity by

  5. Solve for

  6. Cross-check with the adjoint formula

Answer

, and .

Example 2

The theorem for a 3 × 3, and the inverse from it

Question

Verify the Cayley–Hamilton theorem for and hence find .

  1. Compute

    Principal minors:

  2. Write the characteristic equation

    By the theorem: .

  3. Compute

    Row 1 : , ,
    Row 2 : , ,
    Row 3 : , ,

  4. Compute

    Row 1 : , ,
    Row 2 : , ,
    Row 3 : , ,

  5. Substitute and verify

    Position :
    Position :
    Position :
    Position :
    Position :
    Position :
    Position :
    Position :
    Position :

  6. Derive

    Multiply through by :

  7. Evaluate

    Check (row 1 of × column 1 of the bracket): , and

Answer

;  

NoteCompute S₁, S₂, S₃ first and write the equation before touching A² or A³. It tells you exactly which powers you need.

Practice problems

4 with solutions

Work each one on paper first. The full solution — not just the answer — is one click away.

Problem 1Basic

Verify the Cayley–Hamilton theorem for .

Show solution

Characteristic equation:

Answer
Problem 2Exam level

Use the Cayley–Hamilton theorem to find for .

Show solution

Multiply by :

Check:

Answer
Problem 3Exam level

Verify the Cayley–Hamilton theorem for and find .

Show solution

Coefficients.

Characteristic equation:

Compute .

Row 1 : , ,
Row 2 : , ,
Row 3 : , ,

Compute .

Row 1 : , ,
Row 2 : , ,
Row 3 : , ,

Verify :

:   :   :
:   :   :
:   :   :

Inverse. Multiply by :

Check (row 1 of × column 1 of ):

Answer;  
Problem 4Challenge

If , use the Cayley–Hamilton theorem to express in the form .

Show solution

Now climb the powers, reducing at each stage.

Verification.

Directly: the eigenvalues of are and , so those of are and . Then ✓ and

Answer